




|
|
The King of France rides Again
|
His Royal Highness Sen. Harry Reid is at it again. He
was asked about how he felt about the Congressional approval ratings being
just under 25%, lower I might add then our embattled Commander-in-Chief.
His response was like the end of a MasterCard commercial, priceless. Sen.
Reid responded that the numbers were so low because of the war in Iraq. I
think he may be on to something here, because I tend to agree with him in
part.
There is a lot more to it than just Iraq. First you
have to take into account that everything promised by both the House and
Senate have not even begun the path of becoming legislation. Sen. Reid and
Rep. Pelosi made all kinds of promises on everything from Iraq to
immigration reform to be handled in the first 100 hours; still the
majority of those promises have not even been brought to the floor of
either chamber of congress. I guess it is hard to approve of broken
promises.
Ok, so they blame their lack of progress on
obstructionist Republicans, but they control both chambers and did the
same thing two years ago, didn’t they? When the Democrats played the same
game they were just looking out for the people! Tuning that same logic
around, I can see where the Republicans are just looking out for the
people, especially those in camouflage uniforms serving all over the globe
killing and capturing bad guys.
Proposed domestic policies play a role in their
popularity downfall. Especially, the Immigration Reform/Amnesty bill S
1639. It was not just a one sided assault from those of us on the right
side of the political aisle. There were numerous fronts in this fight,
even the AFL-CIO rallied against our legislators in this fight. Just
listen to what our valiant law makers are saying. America must be an evil,
brutal place to live. I wonder why so many people still want to come to
live here. Why reform or add new laws to the books that will go unenforced
for the next 20 years?
The Democrats are pushing to close POW detention
centers, like Guantanimo Bay (GITMO), and bring the terrorists onto the
Continental United States so they can have access to lawyers and our court
system. As a former Marine this does not make any sense, never in the
history of this country have POW’s had access to our court system. The
laws of war and the laws of a civilized nation are two totally separate
systems.
They, the left, say that we are not properly applying
the Geneva Conventions to these bad guys that we capture on the battle
fields of the world trying to kill our sons and daughters, the same sons
and daughters the left wants brought home to save their lives. The
terrorists, who expect that because of the goodness of our civilized
society we will follow the conventions, do not adhere to the same.
In the Part III, Section II, Article 43, Paragraph 3
states:
3. In order to promote the protection of the
civilian population from the effects of hostilities, combatants are
obliged to distinguish themselves from the civilian population while
they are engaged in an attack or in a military operation preparatory
to an attack. Recognizing, however, that there are situations in armed
conflicts where, owing to the nature of the hostilities an armed
combatant cannot so distinguish himself, he shall retain his status as
a combatant, provided that, in such situations, he carries his arms
openly:
(a) during each military engagement, and (b) during such time as he is
visible to the adversary while he is engaged in a military deployment
preceding the launching of an attack in which he is to participate.
Acts which comply with the requirements of this paragraph shall not be
considered as perfidious within the meaning of Article 37, paragraph 1
(c).
Terrorists have the habit of hiding in and among
civilian populations. They either find a sympathetic group, as is done in
the Gaza Strip and West Bank; or through the use of torture and other
violence intimidate a population to hide them, as has been done in
Rhamadi, Faluja, Haditha, and numerous other towns in Iraq.
Many on the left like to classify these terrorists as
either an insurgent, a person who revolts against civil authority or an
established government; a freedom fighter, or someone fighting to free
their home country from tyranny. In fact they are neither in accordance
with the Geneva Conventions.
Again in the Part III, Section II Article 47 states:
1. A mercenary shall not have the right to be a
combatant or a prisoner of war.
2. A mercenary is any person who:
(a) is specially recruited locally or abroad in order to fight in an
armed conflict; (b) does, in fact, take a direct part in the
hostilities; (c) is motivated to take part in the hostilities
essentially by the desire for private gain and, in fact, is promised,
by or on behalf of a Party to the conflict, material compensation
substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of
similar ranks and functions in the armed forces of that Party; (d) is
neither a national of a Party to the conflict nor a resident of
territory controlled by a Party to the conflict; (e) is not a member
of the armed forces of a Party to the conflict; and (f) has not been
sent by a State which is not a Party to the conflict on official duty
as a member of its armed forces.
I prefer terrorist to mercenary, as these are the
methods employed by these "insurgents". You will note that as mercenaries
they are not entitled to POW status, and can be detained indefinitely.
These detainees are not entitled to visits by any humanitarian
organization, or representation by legal council. What is the private gain
mentioned in paragraph 2 subsection c? Try 72 virgins and a guaranteed
place in paradise.
I guess what I am trying to say is that if a stupid, as
John Kerry so adeptly points out, former Marine without the aid of a staff
can find this information; exactly how competent are those that we entrust
to govern our nation from Washington D.C.? Maybe this is why we don’t
approve of the job that either the House of Representatives or the Senate
are doing. Maybe the American people are tired of a Congress that can vote
for the use of force but want to regulate how that force is applied. Or it
could be that the American people do see the similarities to the conflict
in Viet Nam, political pull out. We were winning the battles, just like we
are in Iraq. We were winning hearts and minds, just like we are doing in
Iraq. And politicians wanted us to lose and tried to set time tables and
certain pull out dates, just like they are trying to do in Iraq
|
| |
|